Laporan Performa Survei | Survey Performance Report

Periode Akademik (Academic Period): February 2025 - July 2025

Ambang Batas (Threshold)

3.30

Melampaui Target (Exceeds Target)

Rata-rata Tertinggi (Highest Average)

3.80

Dr. Tutik Susilowati, M.Si.

Rentang Dominan (Dominant Range)

3.65 - 3.80

Stabilitas Kinerja Berkelanjutan (Sustainable Performance Stability)

Komponen Tertinggi (Highest Component)

Q5

Umpan Balik Konstruktif (Constructive Feedback)

Skor Rata-rata Performa Dosen

Average Score of Lecturer Performance

Evaluasi Performa Komponen

Component Performance Evaluation

Analisis Survei & Tindakan Perbaikan

Survey Analysis and Improvement Action

Analisis Hasil (Result Analysis)

Pada semester ini, program studi mencapai peningkatan konsisten dalam kualitas instruksional. Seluruh dosen berhasil meraih skor tinggi antara 3.65 hingga 3.80. Hasil longitudinal mengonfirmasi pemeliharaan kinerja berkualitas tinggi yang selaras dengan tolok ukur institusi. Komponen Q5 (Pemberian umpan balik tepat waktu dan konstruktif) mencapai skor tertinggi (~3.76), menunjukkan keberhasilan prioritas pada interaksi balik mahasiswa. Namun, Q7 (Motivasi mahasiswa) dan Q8 (Pencapaian kompetensi) berada di batas bawah distribusi (~3.70). Meskipun tetap mencerminkan standar keunggulan, area ini menjadi fokus utama peningkatan kualitas di masa depan.

This semester, the study program achieved consistent improvement in instructional quality. All lecturers achieved high scores between 3.65 and 3.80. Longitudinal results confirm the maintenance of high-quality performance in line with institutional benchmarks. Component Q5 (Timely and constructive feedback) achieved the highest score (~3.76), indicating the success of prioritizing student feedback. However, Q7 (Student motivation) and Q8 (Competency achievement) were at the lower end of the distribution (~3.70). While still reflecting standards of excellence, these areas will be the main focus for quality improvement in the future.

Rencana Perbaikan (Improvement Plan)

1

Sesi peninjauan siklus evaluasi bagi dosen di rentang bawah (~3.65).

Evaluation cycle review sessions for faculty members in the lower score range.

2

Penyelarasan persiapan dosen dengan persyaratan periode akreditasi institusi mendatang.

Aligning faculty preparation with upcoming institutional accreditation requirements.

3

Inisiasi program kemitraan dengan praktisi industri sebagai pembicara tamu.

Initiating partnership programs with industry guest speakers to boost motivation and competency (targeting Q7 & Q8).